1970 LT1 - Team Camaro Tech
Engine General Engine Discussion.

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of 12 (permalink) Old Mar 1st, 05, 04:12 AM Thread Starter
MJM
Gold Lifetime Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 368
Post

Does anyone have the specs such as cam type, compression, cyl heads etc. for the 1970 1/2 LT1 Z-28 Camaro engine? I have seen this rated at 350hp, 360Hp, and 370Hp. Which is right? Thanks.
MJM is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 12 (permalink) Old Mar 1st, 05, 07:22 AM
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Columbia, MO USA
Posts: 21,341
Smile

360hp Camaro and 370hp 'Vette/350 motors,

Good old -178 solid cam, 11 to 1 CR. (And the mule Motor got the 370hp rating from a -346, 30-30 Duntov Fuelie cam)..

There is a 350 hp/350 motor too but I think it uses the -969 hy-cam if not mistaken

And the later, lower Cr. versions that used the -178 solid cam were 330hp??

Hope I have this right b/c I'm more a First Gen. motors guy.....

pdq67
pdq67 is offline  
post #3 of 12 (permalink) Old Mar 1st, 05, 11:01 AM
Tech Team
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Hillsboro, Ohio
Posts: 48
Post

Vette and Z motors were identical. Vette was rated at 370 horse because of a better exhaust system. Compression was 11/1. If I remember correctly, the 350 horse was a hydraulic cam with a 750 carb, while the 360 and 370 horse versions had 780 cfm carbs. Real stormers I owned a 70-1/2 Z.

1966 Chevelle Rag Top<br />1963 Split Window Vette<br />409 small block-9.37 @ 144 mph
f370vette is offline  
post #4 of 12 (permalink) Old Mar 1st, 05, 12:34 PM Thread Starter
MJM
Gold Lifetime Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 368
Post

Is the 370 HP the same cam as the 302 or modified for the 350? Was going to build a 383 for my 69 but I have the chance to buy at a really good price a HP 1970 350 from a z I figure if I bring it up to the 370 HP specs It could be a lot of fun to drive and have that nice solid lifter sound and probably save myself a fair chunk of change.
MJM is offline  
post #5 of 12 (permalink) Old Mar 1st, 05, 02:36 PM
Tech Team
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Hillsboro, Ohio
Posts: 48
Post

I haven't been able to find my old books with cam specs. If I find them I'll list the specs. Regardless I wouldn't use an old design in a 383. I'd call Crane or Comp and give the details of the car and how it's to be driven and let them make a recommendation. Both have always been right on with their recommendations. Even special grinds are reasonable with CNC cam grinders.
f370vette is offline  
post #6 of 12 (permalink) Old Mar 1st, 05, 03:12 PM
Gold Lifetime Member
Don
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: 2 Dog Town in West Texas
Posts: 10,477
Post

Direct from the GM HP parts books,,, 70 Lt 350 cam specs were I .458/ E .485 lift at Zero lash. Valve timing:Intake
Open BTC 42 deg@ .40
Clos ABC 94 deg@ .20
Duration 317 deg
Lash .24
Exhaust:
OpenBBC 112 deg @ .50
Closing 53 deg @ .23
Duration 346 deg @ .46
Lash .30
GM part # 3972178.
This was almost same cam as earlier Z28 cam with less duration and split pattern
Hope this helps

Don
TC # 349
Zdld17:69 Z/RS,306, NOR141111, 9N554XXX, 12A, X3G, 59/59,723, AFR 195,CCC282/290HR, TKO 600, BU1122B1E Owner since Dec 1968
http://s102.photobucket.com/albums/m...t=115_1577.jpg
zdld17 is online now  
post #7 of 12 (permalink) Old Mar 1st, 05, 03:20 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Columbia, MO USA
Posts: 21,341
Smile

Like I said, the 370hp/350 motor dyno number came from GM's Mule motor that had the 290hp/302 and 365hp/375hp/327 solid cam in it!

All production motors came with the -178 solid cam b/c they could run it with A/C AND an automatic whereas the old 30-30 solid cam just didn't like A/C and automatics!!

I'd go with a good old CC 282S or even a 294S solid in a strong 383 as long as it is right at 10 to 1 CR, imho...

pdq67

Small block solid cam spec's:

1. –097, little Duntov solid, (287/287 per GM and 272/272 per Pat K.)/228/231, .395”/.383” net, .401”/.383”net, 110.5/108. A GREAT LITTLE CAM, IMHO!!! I ran it in my junk 301 for a couple of years..

2. –178, 330/350 solid, 242/254, .459”/.439net,.485”/.455”net, 116/110.

3. –346 big Duntov or 30-30 solid, (346 per GM, 314 per WBR and 304 per Pat K.)/254/254, .486”/.456”net, .486”/.456”net, 114/112. The cam that gives the 302 it's distinctive sound!!!

4. –140, Z-28 Off Road solid, 257/269, .493”/.469”net, .512”/.486”net, 112/108. More "balls-out"!!

Small block hy-cam spec's:

1. –151, 350/327 hydraulic, 222/222, .447”/.447”, 114/110. Runs great in an L-48 295hp/350 motor!! I ran one for several years in my stock, 295hp/350 motor..

2. –962, 350/350 hydraulic, .450”/.460”, 115/114.
pdq67 is offline  
post #8 of 12 (permalink) Old Mar 1st, 05, 03:26 PM
Senior Tech
Mike
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Calgary, Canada
Posts: 1,850
Post

Corvette 370 HP also had TI ignition, while the camaro used points. I had heard that this made up the extra 10 hp rating.

Just my .25 worth.

2002 Jerry Bickle Cavalier, 446" Small Block, Brodix Canted Valve, lenco 5 speed, 7.54 @ 180. mph,1.06 60', 2235 lbs for 2014. GM Canada Docs, Highly Optioned 69 RSZ28 , Hugger Orange, White Stripes, 42,000 mile survivor, owned since 1973.
rszmjt is offline  
post #9 of 12 (permalink) Old Mar 1st, 05, 03:32 PM
Gold Lifetime Member
Don
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: 2 Dog Town in West Texas
Posts: 10,477
Post

pdq67,,you forgot one ,, 3965754
.512 intake
.536 exh
324/334.

even more balls!
And lets not forget the one that started it all
55/56 "077" 265 ci notch cam

Don
TC # 349
Zdld17:69 Z/RS,306, NOR141111, 9N554XXX, 12A, X3G, 59/59,723, AFR 195,CCC282/290HR, TKO 600, BU1122B1E Owner since Dec 1968
http://s102.photobucket.com/albums/m...t=115_1577.jpg
zdld17 is online now  
post #10 of 12 (permalink) Old Mar 1st, 05, 06:39 PM Thread Starter
MJM
Gold Lifetime Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 368
Post

If I go with the 383 modern roller cam. Great input on a cam for the 70 1/2 Z 350, as much as I like the old school solid cam I also like the 435HP-450 ft lbs of torque from a mild 383. The 350 hi-pro engine (CTB) is a lot cheaper..what a decission!!!
MJM is offline  
post #11 of 12 (permalink) Old Mar 2nd, 05, 01:52 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Columbia, MO USA
Posts: 21,341
Talking

Right you are there!! Money is one reason why I am staying "Old-School" in my "Old-Age" sorta deal.

Seems that the high-zoot, modern stuff just costs a lot more for not all that much more bang for my hard-earned buck...

But, again, I'm a tight-a--, --er, eh, "frugal" is all...

But I do know that a good street solid roller will make alotta POWER!!

pdq67
pdq67 is offline  
post #12 of 12 (permalink) Old Mar 2nd, 05, 02:22 PM Thread Starter
MJM
Gold Lifetime Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 368
Post

RIGHT-ON [img]graemlins/beers.gif[/img]
MJM is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Team Camaro Tech forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address.
NOTE we receive a lot of registrations with bad email addresses. IF you do not receive your confirmation email you will not be able to post. contact support and we will try and help.
Be sure you enter a valid email address and check your spam folder as well.



Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome