1969z11
Oct 1st, 07, 10:51 AM
When I talked to a local restoration shop, they suggested that we NOT strip the factory undercoating of my 69 unless we absolutely HAD to. His theory was that he'd rather not expose any of the metal that was currently sealed to oxygen, and simply recoat (I'm not sure how, but...) the underneath if it seemed solid. Plus, it's a crap load of messy, nasty work... I've ripped out the interior and carpet and the floor of the car is 99% perfect, the factory paint is intact, etc. The only area of any concern was a little surface rust under the driver's feet, but even it only looks superficial and can probably be cleaned with a wire brush, it's really that solid. Can I take this as a sign that resealing the bottom of the car is a legit plan? I've crawled under it and it looks good and solid. I know more when I take the rear springs off here in a few days, but right now I see no areas of real concern under the car or under the carpet... Is this a good practice or is just a form of saving money (time) in the wrong place? BTW, the car will be a driver and not a full-on show car but will live a pampered life in a garage, i.e no snow, no rain (on purpose, anyhow), etc...