View Full Version : help for a "little" big block
AJBorski Nov 26th, 01, 10:31 AM I have just received my money from uncle same and am really looking at putting my engine together. I want to go with a little different combo please tell me what you think.
396 2 bolt block .060, studs on mains
factory steel crank
stock length rods, arp wave lock bolts
10.25/1 forged floating pistons
Brodix -1 OEFI oval port heads
RPM intake and demon 750 carb
1.7:1 comp cams roller rockers.
Now life gets complicated, I was thinking roller cam until the recent post I read here.
So what about a solid?
maybe a CC 282S or a Crane 282F?
I want close to 500hp and good tq out of the motor.. any suggestions? Maybe power numbers for this combo?
How about the heads? would I yield better power with a set of edelbrock RPMs?
I am ready to start just need some guidance on what to do, so I leave it up to the experts! Thanks up front,
Tony
RickD Nov 26th, 01, 10:54 AM Not too many months ago there was a 396 build up in either Car Craft or Popular Hot Rodding. Did you see it? It made an interesting case for a stout, affordable 396.
------------------
Rick Dorion
69 RS Conv,355,M20,4.10's and I don't worry about stone chips.
lil_beast_67 Nov 26th, 01, 01:07 PM Camaro Performers I think is what you're talking about, I just got done reading the article. they used a comp cams street roller grind with 236/242 duration at .050, 0.647/.654 lift and 110 degree seperation. It sounds mild but the engine put out over 500 horses. I can give more information on the engine if you want, the article is sitting in front of me.
AJBorski Nov 26th, 01, 01:36 PM Rick and lil_beast_67,
I have the "mean little rodent" series in both super Chevy and Camaro Performers. I think this is the article you both are referring to, Great articles. That is where I concluded the brodix heads have some bite to them.
-My big question is on the roller cam idea. I recently read a post on this topic here and it sounded like solid rollers stink on the street. I don't want to pay $800 plus for the setup that I have to change out in less then 10,000 miles. I hope to find a solid grind that can give good power numbers for this set up.
-I also wonder if the performer rpm heads might be a better choice for this setup..
- I finally caved in and decided I will go BBC over the small block, but as always I "have to be different" then everyone else on the block!
Thanks for the replies guys!
Tony
roger69 Nov 26th, 01, 03:50 PM Sounds like a great combo so far.
As for the cam give Comp Cams a call, sure you have to wait to get a tech but its worth it. I would think a flat tappet cam should work fine. You will need sometning like the XE284 to get you close to 480 -500 HP in 402 and you will have to spin it a little close to 6600 RPM
The 2 bolt studed block will hold up fine. As for rods if you dont have a set ( or they need to be rebuilt) check out GMMP 7/16 rods from Sallee Chevrolt . You get NEW 4340 forged rods with good 7/16 bolts ready to bolt in for $350.00 I have had these past 7200 rpm( on accident)
I dont have any experiance with the Brodix Ovals but I have built a .030 over 396 with the Signature Series aluminum heads from GM with the 2.25 / 1.88 valves and they do clear the bore but make sure you notch the tops like the 375 HP 396. These are the same head as the Performers for BBs
http://www.sallee-chevrolet.com/sales.html
[This message has been edited by roger69 (edited 11-26-2001).]
Eric68 Nov 26th, 01, 04:12 PM I've always been a little leary of any hydraulic lifter cam that is intended to spin over 6000, especially over 6500 RPM's.
I helped a friend with the XE284 in a 327 SBC extensively this summer and the engine just starts to fade over 6500 RPM. It should pull like crazy to 7000+ with that cam and it just dies. We've gone the whole route with heads, carbs, intake, ignition, valve springs - everything and we're certain the hydraulic lifters are the culprit.
I'm not a BBC or roller cam guru, but the two solid grinds you mention look real good to me. I don't know the lobe separation on the Crane cam, but in general Crane uses wider separation angles than Comp - this moves the RPM band up a tad AND smoothes the idle a little over a cam with the same duration numbers and a tighter separation angle. (I personally like Comp's 110 LSA for larger torque monster engines, wider LSA's work better on small cube high winders IMO)
I'll play with Desktop Dyno a bit and post again if I have any ideas - but it looks good to me.
Good luck with the build!
------------------
68 Camaro, 383 small block with TH350 trans. 11.98's at 111mph and never trailered.
pdq67 Nov 26th, 01, 04:50 PM IMHO, the 282S sounds like it is about right for your combination. I just ran it through Dyno2000 with small tube open headers and 2.19"/1.88" valves and got something like 518hp at 6000rpm and 506t at 4500rpm.
I know it is just a sim. program, but if you are within - 5 to 7%, you will have one sweet running BB!
pdq67
AJBorski Nov 26th, 01, 05:41 PM Hey guys thanks for the input. I think the solid by cc is the best way to go. I will call them tomarrow and see what they recomend.
PDQ67 518hp wow! Good #s on both sides. Like you said even if off by 7% those are good numbers I could live with. Thanks again,
Tony
Slowazzbu Nov 27th, 01, 07:01 AM How about a small cube bbc that can make just short of 600hp, and runs 10.70's @ 125 mph in a 3500 lb car. This engine also has GM 781 iron truck heads (no porting), mild Comp Cams Xtreme Energy street roller cam, and 10.5 to 1 compression.
I'll make you a nice deal on it if you wanna run mid 10's in your car http://www.camaros.net/forum/wink.gif
Actually, the Brodix -1 OEFI is a real good head, but is way too expensive IMO. $2000 for a pair of aluminum oval port heads compared to a pair of GM iron heads that will run the same ET or quicker for half the cost...your choice.
If money were no option, the Brodix would make a good choice, but reworked stock heads will do the same job, just as well if not better. The 70 lbs weight savings of aluminum heads isn't worth the extra $1000 IMO.
------------------
Malibumotorsports (http://www.Malibumotorsports.cjb.net)
79 Malibu, 414 ci BBC, 3550 lbs.
10.75 @ 123.8 mph, 1.50 60'
MY10secSS Nov 27th, 01, 08:27 AM Many(++++) years ago I put together a 402BBC with oval port closed chamber heads (2.19/1.88 valves) 10.25 compression and a Holley single plane with a 750cfm DP and 2" hedman headers. The cam I used was the 282S and I loved it. I could get away with high test pump gas and a little octane boost or 50/50 mix with race gas. In a 3600# car, T350 2800 stall and 3.73 gear with slapper bars it ran 12.50's @119mph.BTW the trans was slippin bad too...
AJBorski Nov 27th, 01, 01:06 PM All right, I called Comp Cams, they suggested I step it up a bit with a 294S cam. What do you guys think of this one? PDQ67, any suggestions? Does anybody think I will gain any power by going with the RPM heads? I think the smaller ports of the brodix heads will give better acceleration, but not sure.
-Slowazzbu... Thanks for the offer but I am enjoying the build it yourself thing right now..Outstanding numbers though!
Please keep giving me input, I don't want to buy the wrong combo of parts..Thanks,
Tony
Slowazzbu Nov 27th, 01, 01:33 PM Tony,
Actually, I was just kidding about selling my lil 414 rat http://www.camaros.net/forum/smile.gif
Why not consider using a pair of real mild prepped GM 781 or 049 oval port heads? If not GM heads, the use the Merlin oval ports.
I know they will run just as well if not better than the brodix, yet cost half as much.
------------------
Malibumotorsports (http://www.Malibumotorsports.cjb.net)
79 Malibu, 414 ci BBC, 3550 lbs.
10.75 @ 123.8 mph, 1.50 60'
[This message has been edited by Slowazzbu (edited 11-27-2001).]
AJBorski Nov 27th, 01, 01:57 PM slowazzbu,
Got it http://www.camaros.net/forum/wink.gif I am not to worried about the cost thing. I almost bought the grumpy Jenkins heads but I decided that a little savings over the front will be good for my application. Hate to call it pro touring but I do have a few High dollar left & right turn accessories.. I would like to get the most out of them. Most would say go small block however, I have a soft spot for the 396, (the engine in my first Camaro) SO as I digress, am going with the 396 and would rather keep the aluminum heads unless my budget changes. Like they say “ If you have the money why not get what you want http://www.camaros.net/forum/smile.gif” Definitely food for thought though, thanks!
Tony
oger Nov 27th, 01, 04:03 PM Tony if your motor runs half as good as Todds 414 be real happy. I still haven't completely figured out why it runs so good but it sure does.
Slowazzbu Nov 27th, 01, 04:33 PM oger (mike),
It's all in the BSE Powered combination. http://www.camaros.net/forum/wink.gif http://www.camaros.net/forum/biggrin.gif
In all honesty, I never would have guessed the lil' 414 would run as quick as it has. I really thought 10.90's were all it had in it. I suppose I've got nothing to complain about http://www.camaros.net/forum/smile.gif
------------------
Malibumotorsports (http://www.Malibumotorsports.cjb.net)
79 Malibu, 414 ci BBC, 3550 lbs.
10.75 @ 123.8 mph, 1.50 60'
[This message has been edited by Slowazzbu (edited 11-27-2001).]
pdq67 Nov 27th, 01, 04:52 PM AJBorski,
Get hold of GGriffin, in Moberly, MO b/c he has a 10.75 to 1 CR. or thereabouts .040" over 402 with the 294S cam in it. His heads are closed chambered ovals. He can give you the straight-skinny on the cam. Greg used ta peek in every once in a while but he mighta got busy, if you know what I mean. I saw his red '69, last weekend. Tell him I said hello.
As for the Brodix aluminum heads, buy what you want and can afford, but if I had it to do over again, I woulda bought a cheap set of Canfield aluminum heads from Competition Products, but they weren't on the market that I knew of when I got my C.I. oval Merlins. pdq67
AJBorski Nov 29th, 01, 06:33 PM pdq67,
I will try and find him. Thanks everyone for your input, as I am still a green horn at this, every comment is appreciated.
Tony
|