Team Camaro Tech join team camaro
 
Camaro Parts at SS396.com     
GROUND UP & SS396.com         
Official Sponsor of Team Camaro
   

Registered users (free) do not see these large ads

EFI in your modern Classic EFI conversions in FirstGen Camaros

View Poll Results: I'm going to Tuned Port Injection. Which system would you use:
MAF 1 20.00%
MAP 4 80.00%
Voters: 5. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old May 25th, 07, 04:14 PM
glide glide is offline
Tech Team

 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 34
Default MAF or MAP ???

I am planning to put a tuned port system on my 69 307. I read in one book that MAF is superior, and easier to program, adn programming is not as critical. Elsewhere I am told MAP is the only way to go. Harder to program, but worth the effort. I expect access soon to a MAF from an 86 firebird donor. WHat would you do? Please post pro's and con's of both systems.

I am considering adding some boost eventually if that matters.

Thanks,

Tom
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old May 25th, 07, 04:33 PM
camcojb camcojb is offline
Super Moderator

Jody
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Wilton, Ca. USA
Posts: 5,466
Default Re: MAF or MAP ???

I don't know that MAF is easier because to tune it correctly you shut the MAF off and tune the VE tables in speed density (running off the map only). So you have your map tune done then turn the MAF back on and tune it to match. Reason being in the case of a maf failure you have the correct tune in the computer; otherwise it could get expensive in that situation.

MAF is more forgiving to mods and a nice way to go. But with a forced induction build I prefer to ditch the map, but I run a fair amount of boost. At that level you'll peg the maf usually and then the tuning becomes sketchy at best in my opinion. On a boost application that isn't moving enough air to peg the maf, then the maf is still a nice way to go.

I've tuned both and with the correct tune they were each as smooth as the other.

Jody
__________________
new updated website!

64 Chevelle twin turbo LS2
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old May 25th, 07, 05:11 PM
South Side Goons & Hitmen South Side Goons & Hitmen is offline
Gold Member

 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Chi-town's South Side
Posts: 2,345
Default Re: MAF or MAP ???

I guess the Mass Air Flow sensor (MAF) vs Manifold Absolute Pressure (MAP) debate is like 400 SBC vs 396 BBC, Holley vs Edelbrock, 4L60 vs 200-4R, 427 L88 BBC vs 454 LS6 BBC, 302 SBC vs 350 LT1 SBC, Ford vs Chevy, Dodge vs Ford, Toyota vs Honda. The debate may never end.

P.S. For 1990 the IROC-Z went away from the MAF to a Speed Density System (SDS) and gained 5 horsepower. I know that for sure. I belive the SDS setup requires an MAP sensor. I'm not sure on that so I will defer to the experts as there are very few 1990 IROC-Z's out there.

I believe with Ford they did it the other way.....First came the MAP then came the MAF. Once again, I'm not sure on that and I will defer to the experts. I do believe the Ford guys like the MAF sensor better.
__________________
1) 1969 Camaro RS 396 TH 400, 12 bolt 3:73 sold 1994
2) 1984 Z28, 5.0 H.O. T-Tops, G92 3:73, sold 1994
3) 1988 5.7L IROC-Z, sold 1994
4) 1969 Camaro bought 2006, needs work once again

Last edited by South Side Goons & Hitmen; May 25th, 07 at 05:59 PM. Reason: P.S.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old May 25th, 07, 05:12 PM
wiskeesour's Avatar
wiskeesour wiskeesour is offline
Team Member

Harley
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Greenville, TX
Posts: 5,885
Blog Entries: 19
Default Re: MAF or MAP ???

i like map
__________________
AE2(AW) Harley Moody, USNavy
"Master-at-Arms" for the CDWJB!!
November 26th, 2008 was my last day to serve my country as a member of the World's Greatest Navy.
Thanks Chief.
Reply With Quote
 
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Location Map of forum members Al Welcome Wagon 88 Nov 4th, 09 06:27 PM
RPO Map Light #???? if any ascamaro Tag Team 2 May 14th, 07 12:06 PM
low vacuum and MAP sensor PACaprice Engine 7 Aug 4th, 06 02:07 PM
MAF TPI rough idle shuanm Engine 1 Mar 27th, 06 04:23 AM
86 TPI intake MAF? Racing_Master Engine 2 Oct 24th, 05 07:21 PM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:02 PM.


Camaros.net - © 2009 AutoForums.com