2.08 Intake on a 400 .030 Overbore - Team Camaro Tech
Team Camaro Tech join team camaro
 
Camaro Parts at SS396.com     
GROUND UP & SS396.com         
Official Sponsor of Team Camaro
   

Auto Insurance



Registered users (free) do not see these large ads

Engine General Engine Discussion.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old Jan 17th, 08, 10:44 AM
76' Bad Bird 76' Bad Bird is offline
Tech Team

Shannon
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Lafayette La.
Posts: 37
Question 2.08 Intake on a 400 .030 Overbore

Have a small block 400 thirty over with a set of Dart Pro 1's 2.08 intake and 1.60 Exaust Anyone forsee problems on a street strip car. Compression will be 11.3.
__________________
76'fire bird Trans Am Under total resto
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
  #2  
Old Jan 17th, 08, 10:54 AM
Steve69SS396's Avatar
Steve69SS396 Steve69SS396 is offline
Gold Lifetime Member

Steve
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Modesto, CA
Posts: 1,783
Default Re: 2.08 Intake on a 400 .030 Overbore

Don't quite understand your question. Are you asking if the valve size will cause a problem? Or maybe you are asking about piston to valve clearance?
__________________
'69 Camaro - 427 SBC Dart Iron Eagle 9.325" block, Cola crank, Lunati 6" Pro Mod rods, JE pistons (13.8:1), Total Seal rings, hand ported AFR 210 heads, Jesel belt drive, custom ground 4-7 swap solid roller 274/286 @ .050" with .660" lift, Dart single plane, 1050 Dominator, Stef's #1705R oil pan, NOS big shot, Lemons 2" primary 3-1/2" collector, Coan 8" converter
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old Jan 17th, 08, 11:00 AM
76' Bad Bird 76' Bad Bird is offline
Tech Team

Shannon
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Lafayette La.
Posts: 37
Default Re: 2.08 Intake on a 400 .030 Overbore

Engine runs but is set up with a 1050 carb and a drag cam. Wondering about the valve size. Every thing I find puts it borderline.Just looking for clarification.Thanks for cathing that slip up.
__________________
76'fire bird Trans Am Under total resto
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old Jan 17th, 08, 11:18 AM
Steve69SS396's Avatar
Steve69SS396 Steve69SS396 is offline
Gold Lifetime Member

Steve
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Modesto, CA
Posts: 1,783
Default Re: 2.08 Intake on a 400 .030 Overbore

Quote:
Originally Posted by 76' Bad Bird View Post
Engine runs but is set up with a 1050 carb and a drag cam. Wondering about the valve size. Every thing I find puts it borderline.Just looking for clarification.Thanks for cathing that slip up.
Still don't quite understand, but I'm running AFR 210 heads on my 355 with 2.08" valves. That valve size shouldn't be a problem in your 406.
__________________
'69 Camaro - 427 SBC Dart Iron Eagle 9.325" block, Cola crank, Lunati 6" Pro Mod rods, JE pistons (13.8:1), Total Seal rings, hand ported AFR 210 heads, Jesel belt drive, custom ground 4-7 swap solid roller 274/286 @ .050" with .660" lift, Dart single plane, 1050 Dominator, Stef's #1705R oil pan, NOS big shot, Lemons 2" primary 3-1/2" collector, Coan 8" converter
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old Jan 17th, 08, 02:27 PM
DOUG G DOUG G is online now
Gold Lifetime Member

RedЯuM
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Harford Co, Maryland. USA
Posts: 14,866
Default Re: 2.08 Intake on a 400 .030 Overbore

2.08's should be ok... but that 1050 carb and only 11.3:1 ? I see the carb as an issue.
__________________
68 Camaro~ LSx
RedЯum <-Pics
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Of8WV...ature=youtu.be <~More here
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old Jan 17th, 08, 02:55 PM
HarleyD67's Avatar
HarleyD67 HarleyD67 is offline
Senior Tech

Harley D
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Sugar Creek,WI
Posts: 2,680
Default Re: 2.08 Intake on a 400 .030 Overbore

Ditto on the carb issue. I can tell you for a fact that 2.08's fit a std 400 bore. I've got AFR210's on my 427. Now with Steve's combo I would have some clearance concerns.
__________________

"Be who you are and say what you feel, because those mind don't matter, and those who matter don't mind."-Dr. Seuss
We learn life's important lessons in kindergarten.

Harley D
'67 coupe 427SBC
60'1.7281/4-11.83@115.59
firstgens.com
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old Jan 17th, 08, 04:05 PM
Steve69SS396's Avatar
Steve69SS396 Steve69SS396 is offline
Gold Lifetime Member

Steve
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Modesto, CA
Posts: 1,783
Default Re: 2.08 Intake on a 400 .030 Overbore

Quote:
Originally Posted by HarleyD67 View Post
Now with Steve's combo I would have some clearance concerns.
They bolted right on without any clearance problem. Been doing fine for 8 years now. Here is how it performs:

My '69 Camaro running 10.47 @ 129MPH with a 1.52 sixty foot at Sacramento Raceway. 355 SBC with a 150 shot.
__________________
'69 Camaro - 427 SBC Dart Iron Eagle 9.325" block, Cola crank, Lunati 6" Pro Mod rods, JE pistons (13.8:1), Total Seal rings, hand ported AFR 210 heads, Jesel belt drive, custom ground 4-7 swap solid roller 274/286 @ .050" with .660" lift, Dart single plane, 1050 Dominator, Stef's #1705R oil pan, NOS big shot, Lemons 2" primary 3-1/2" collector, Coan 8" converter
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old Jan 17th, 08, 04:25 PM
GOSFAST GOSFAST is offline
Senior Tech

 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 324
Default Re: 2.08 Intake on a 400 .030 Overbore

Quote:
Originally Posted by 76' Bad Bird View Post
Have a small block 400 thirty over with a set of Dart Pro 1's 2.08 intake and 1.60 Exaust Anyone forsee problems on a street strip car. Compression will be 11.3.
That's actually a good combo. (Have made some decent power with those "Pro-Ones" also!)

On a recent build (with a "Dart" block) 406" 11:1, Pro-Topline 235's (2.080's), a "small" solid roller, and a "Victor" with a 4500 and 2.000" primaries unit cam off the dyno @ 610 HP.

Is in a "street/strip" ride now, 3600#+, and runs 10.70's @ 124 MPH. All on 93 octane!

Thanks, Gary in N.Y.

P.S. In all honesty, a 2.080" valve or larger actually hurts the overall performance on a 4.000" SB (either +.030" or +.060"). The larger valves end up experiencing flow issues with the cylinder walls. We just delivered a 383" SB with 550+ HP using some 2.020's (older Brownfields) and 93 octane also! These are all slightly "higher-end" solid-roller units, not "budget-builds"!
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:58 PM.



Camaros.net - © 2009 AutoForums.com