Your opinions on this camshaft - Team Camaro Tech
Team Camaro Tech join team camaro
 
Camaro Parts at SS396.com     
GROUND UP & SS396.com         
Official Sponsor of Team Camaro
   

Auto Insurance



Registered users (free) do not see these large ads

Performance Our High Performance area

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old Apr 23rd, 04, 10:01 AM
jmr1965 jmr1965 is offline
Tech Team

 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Costa Rica
Posts: 45
Post

I've got this friend that gives me this brand new camshaft for free, and I wondered if you could give me your opinions on how it would perform on my pocket-ported vortec-headed, 5.7" rods 406 cid, Weiand #7546 open-plenum intake, headers, 700 cfm Holley carburettor, 10.1 cr.

The cam specs are:
Lift I/E: 468/480
Duration @.006: 304/287
Duration @.050: 220/231
IVO: 46 IVC: 78
EVO: 73 EVC: 34
Lobe C/L: 110
Overlap: 80

Is this a good option for a nice manual gearboxed street car? What differential ratio would you suggest for occasionally motoring? Your guess on power?

I'm taking it anyway but just wanted to know if it's worhtwhile to put in this motor.

Thanks indeed,

JorgeMR
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
  #2  
Old Apr 23rd, 04, 10:08 AM
travis travis is offline
Senior Tech

 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: skiatook, ok
Posts: 3,692
Post

It is a bit on the small side for a 400, but should make very strong torque and pull well to about 5K or so. Also, if you are going to use vortec heads, you will be much better off getting a dedicated vortec intake. Old style intakes like the 7546 weiand do not match the ports well and many of them do not seal well on the vortec heads at all.
__________________
"This is not a cheerocracy...I make the cheercisions around here"
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old Apr 23rd, 04, 11:36 AM
Fuji Fuji is offline
Senior Tech

 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 120
Post

I'd pass on it real fast. With a 78 degree intake closing and 80 degrees of overlap, you're going to need a lot more than 10:1 compression to make it work at all. Idle quality and street manners will be terrible. It looks like a lift-rule circle track or stock eliminator cam. Just my $.02.
__________________
Chris Avery
'69 Camaro 383 SBC
11.36@118.90 (2977' DA)
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old Apr 23rd, 04, 12:02 PM
pdq67 pdq67 is offline
Banned

 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Columbia, MO USA
Posts: 21,341
Question

Seems to be an older design??? but yet the 110 LSA isn't all that old?? And I think Fuji hit it pretty close??? (Race motor roundy-round, 2-barrel cam??)....

Who made it???

And am assuming it's a hydraulic cam??

pdq67
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old Apr 23rd, 04, 01:25 PM
travis travis is offline
Senior Tech

 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: skiatook, ok
Posts: 3,692
Post

220/231@.050 isn't exactly big. It looks like a off the shelf speed-pro grind to me. Older design perhaps because of the long seat timing, but the .050 numbers are well in the streetable range.
__________________
"This is not a cheerocracy...I make the cheercisions around here"
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old Apr 23rd, 04, 01:33 PM
jmr1965 jmr1965 is offline
Tech Team

 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Costa Rica
Posts: 45
Post

Thank you very much for your inputs on this.

Certainly this is a hydraulic Speed Pro camshaft PN CS1062R.

As per your views, I think I will take it (it's at home now!) as it's for free and try to sell it later on.

As usual, I appreciate your kind responses and your constant disposition to help.

Yours,

Jorge MR
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old Apr 23rd, 04, 03:13 PM
pdq67 pdq67 is offline
Banned

 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Columbia, MO USA
Posts: 21,341
Question

Boy, I missed this one??

Guy's, why would they make a cam like this??

Long advertised duration numbers, modern 110 degree LCA thing, but yet a shorter exhaust event then intake, but yet more exhaust lift than the intake????

I've seen spec's on lower exhaust lift but longer duration, exhaust vs intake but not the other way???? I think they said it was a way to take heat off the exhaust valve springs so they wouldn't fatigue as fast???

Anybody got a reason why they made it this way??

Harold, are you around??

pdq67
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old Apr 24th, 04, 07:36 AM
pdq67 pdq67 is offline
Banned

 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Columbia, MO USA
Posts: 21,341
Question

ttt..

For discussion of my last comments..

pdq67
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old Apr 24th, 04, 09:23 AM
Fuji Fuji is offline
Senior Tech

 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 120
Post

Travis,

I hear what you are saying about .050 duration, but keep in mind that an engine doesn't "see" .050 duration - only valve opening and closing points. Believe me,
with 80 degrees of overlap and a 78 degree intake closing point this cam will be a disaster in a 10:1 street motor. Run it through Pat Kelley's DCR calculator - 7.2 DCR.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:57 AM.



Camaros.net - 2009 AutoForums.com