[cortezsilver]

Can you guys give your opinion on the stamp

[DZ Fool]

Maybe real --- looks to good though

[nashcar]

I would say it's good.

[Kurt S]

Hugger orange car, sold new in WA.
Yes, real pad.

[frankk]

How long did it take to find that one?

[cortezsilver]

Originally Posted by Kurt S

Hugger orange car, sold new in WA.
Yes, real pad.

How did you know the details?

[Mr. Super Sport]

Originally Posted by cortezsilver

How did you know the details?

I'm guessing he has the vin in his data base of Camaros?

[Kurt S]

I got this really cool crystal ball for xmas last year.


It just looks cool though, otherwise useless.
For real info, I look in the db. On ebay last year.

[cortezsilver]

Originally Posted by Kurt S

I got this really cool crystal ball for xmas last year.


It just looks cool though, otherwise useless.
For real info, I look in the db. On ebay last year.

Kurt, sent you 2 pm's

[Jonesy]

Just put the VIN in the search feature here at this site and see what you find:

http://www.camaros.net/forums/showth...=124379L515878

[Paul68RS/Z28]

Originally Posted by Jonesy

Just put the VIN in the search feature here at this site and see what you find:

http://www.camaros.net/forums/showth...=124379L515878

Mike, I ran the Vin, nothing came up. Is it 12437 as in the link or is the 7 a 1 as on the block stamp?

Paul

[TModel66]

The 7 is correct. I ran the VIN and it came up with the previous thread that was refered to.

[Paul68RS/Z28]

Originally Posted by TModel66

The 7 is correct. I ran the VIN and it came up with the previous thread that was refered to.

So the 1 (first digit) on the engine stamp is really a 7? When compairing it to the other 7 on the pad, they look completely different. Was that normal?

I've have no experience at all when it comes to 69's, just trying to learn something on this one.

Thanks,
Paul

[Vintage 68]

Originally Posted by Paul68RS/Z28

So the 1 (first digit) on the engine stamp is really a 7? When compairing it to the other 7 on the pad, they look completely different. Was that normal?

I've have no experience at all when it comes to 69's, just trying to learn something on this one.

Thanks,
Paul

No
The "Partial" on the pad is a derivitive of the full VIN used to ID parts.
Format is;
1 = Chevrolet Division
9 = 1969 Model Year
N = Norwood, Ohio final assembly plant
5XXXXX = full sequencial number of vehicle.

Mike searched using the actual VIN, which he can guess at by the 'partial' given.
Format would be;
1 = Chevrolet
2 = Camaro
4 = V8 engine
37 = Sport Coupe designation for body type
9 = 1969 Model Year
N = Norwood
5XXXXX = sequencial number

Once you've looked at the numbers for awhile is becomes second nature to interchange them

[Paul68RS/Z28]

Originally Posted by Vintage 68

No
The "Partial" on the pad is a derivitive of the full VIN used to ID parts.
Format is;
1 = Chevrolet Division
9 = 1969 Model Year
N = Norwood, Ohio final assembly plant
5XXXXX = full sequencial number of vehicle.

Mike searched using the actual VIN, which he can guess at by the 'partial' given.
Format would be;
1 = Chevrolet
2 = Camaro
4 = V8 engine
37 = Sport Coupe designation for body type
9 = 1969 Model Year
N = Norwood
5XXXXX = sequencial number

Once you've looked at the numbers for awhile is becomes second nature to interchange them

Got it, Thanks, Paul