![]() |
|
Camaro Parts at SS396.com GROUND UP & SS396.com Official Sponsor of Team Camaro |
|
|
||
| Team Camaro Tech Current Topic: Aeromotive fuel tank / fuel system | ||
| Register | FAQ | Calendar | Chat | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Sponsors | Auto Escrow | Auto Loans | Insurance |
Registered users (free) do not see these large ads 
| Performance Our High Performance area |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hey folks,
I am just about to buy this Aeromotive fuel tank and the rest of their fuel system for my 68 Camaro. http://www.summitracing.com/parts/AEI-18657/ Has anyone used one of these tanks yet or have any thoughts about it? I'm running a 540 with a carburetor. I'm going to use their regulator and do a return fuel system. Thanks, John
__________________
1968 SS 396 10.7 @ 125 - 3900lbs (the 396 is under a tarp in the back of the garage) |
| Sponsored Links | ||
Advertisement | ||
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
What is your concern. Aeromotive is a respected company. One man's garbage is another man's treasure, you know?
__________________
69 SS Clone, soon to be Metal Man's version of Fathom Green with white pearl D90 stripes, 355, pocket ported 041 heads, mild hydraulic cam, Demon carb,GW subframe connectors and solid body bushings, 8.5 10 bolt, 2004R |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Have you checked TANKS inc. out? They make the tank for a Aeromotive.
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
The biggest concern I have is I feel like I'm the first one into the pool with this thing. It looks like a great product, but I would love to hear someone say they run this tank, with a carburated motor, in a 10-second street car.
And I have seen the TANKS website- yes, the exact same tank but not the same pump.
__________________
1968 SS 396 10.7 @ 125 - 3900lbs (the 396 is under a tarp in the back of the garage) |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Somebody has to be "the first in the pool". Why not you?
__________________
69 SS Clone, soon to be Metal Man's version of Fathom Green with white pearl D90 stripes, 355, pocket ported 041 heads, mild hydraulic cam, Demon carb,GW subframe connectors and solid body bushings, 8.5 10 bolt, 2004R |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
I am looking at the same set up, but for a 69. Found very little feedback on it. My concern is how well will it work in drag racing (1/4 tank of fuel) with the pump mounted in the front of the tank.
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
I would want a bigger (more gal/lbs per hour) pump.
Larger fuel line, minimum AN8-1/2". And the pump/ pick up at the rear of the tank in a sump. JMHO. I run an Aeromotive Eliminator pump, in the tank (sump pick up) with AN10-5/8" feed line. My pump is maxed out with a low 9 second car on gasoline, the Eliminator moves almost twice as much fuel as the Stealth 340 in that tank. ---Bill.
__________________
1968 Procharged 383, EFI, GF5R 5 speed, 7" two disc clutch 9.10 @148 vid http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9tK2vx1o0fw 1.28 60' vid http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1OLzx5jBo4w |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
There is a baffle in the tank that keeps the fuel from moving away from the pick up, so I'm not too concerned about that. I have a stock style pickup with a mechanical pump that is doing the job now. But the mechanical system vapor-locks easily, especially with winter gas on a warm day- something I have been trying to cure for years... This high-pressure system without a pump bolted to the block will hopefully cure that. I have my toe in the pool, but damn- the water ain't cheap!
__________________
1968 SS 396 10.7 @ 125 - 3900lbs (the 396 is under a tarp in the back of the garage) |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
I have a 496 procharged about 800 plus hp easy I use the stock tank with a robmc 1/2" line and return pickup. The only thing is I make sure I have at least a half of a tank before I tromp it.
|
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Do you have 1/2(-8)fuel line up to the carb? |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
I use a weldon a1000. The Robmc pickup comes with -8 or -10an fittings. I use -8an to the regulator and back. THe regulator is mounted in the engine compartment and have a boost referenced regulator. It regulates fuel flow, it ads one lb ofpressure per lb of boost. I like the weldon or the magnafuel(Puller style) they are both pullers meaning they do not rely on gravity feed(this way I did not have to sump the tank and mount the pump low) and will run without overheating on the street. The weldon was much less $$.
|
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
The install was pretty easy. It has been a long time since I wired an electric fuel pump system- crawling around under the dash and snaking wires through the full interior isn't fun, but luckily I have a short memory. The plumbing was simple once we learned how the PTFE fittings worked. The only non-Summit fitting I used leaked. The pump is very quiet- it is all good!
__________________
1968 SS 396 10.7 @ 125 - 3900lbs (the 396 is under a tarp in the back of the garage) |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
Regarding the vaporlock issue...do you have the tank vented? Be a little cautious about returning fuel from engine back into tank. If you cruise around much it can really heat up the fuel in the tank then you have a new problem. Just my $.02 worth.
__________________
68 coupe ,572,tko |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
Heat up the fuel if it recirculates? I'm way more concerned that it would heat up dead-headed at the carb! That isn't a theory I had heard. But yes, vented tank. Aeromotive has that all taken care of- there is a vent port and they supply a vent end with a check valve in cast the shiny side doesn't stay up... THAT would be a new problem!
__________________
1968 SS 396 10.7 @ 125 - 3900lbs (the 396 is under a tarp in the back of the garage) |
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
If you do a search on here about over heating fuel ...common problem if cruising any length of time in warm weather with return from engine.
__________________
68 coupe ,572,tko |
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|