less expensive option than lee 62420 for conversion - Team Camaro Tech
Team Camaro Tech join team camaro
 
Camaro Parts at SS396.com     
GROUND UP & SS396.com         
Official Sponsor of Team Camaro
   

Auto Insurance



Registered users (free) do not see these large ads

Brakes, Suspension & Steering Conversion questions, Steering & Handling

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old Feb 14th, 13, 07:35 AM
kellys69camaro kellys69camaro is offline
Senior Tech

kelly
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: yorktown, va
Posts: 213
Default less expensive option than lee 62420 for conversion

i have 67 camaro with third gen conversion. needing the coupler. I have read posts about other couplers and this is what i have found on couplers that MIGHT work.

dorman #31011 $41.79
lee #62429 $79.00
lares #200 $20.00.

big differences in prices. any major differences quality and fitment? or is it with paying the almost 100.00 with shipping to Lee's.

will the others work just as well.

looking for a bolt on application with no mods.
__________________
1967 Red/Red RS/SS 350 4 speed
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
  #2  
Old Feb 14th, 13, 09:20 AM
77thor's Avatar
77thor 77thor is offline
Gold Lifetime Member

Fred
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Milwaukee, WI USA
Posts: 1,747
Default Re: less expensive option than lee 62420 for conversion

I used the Lares in my upgrade.
It seems to be a quality part. No issues.
__________________
1969 Camaro SS350, M21, 12 Bolt, 01B LOS Build
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old Feb 14th, 13, 09:37 AM
Eric Kammerer Eric Kammerer is offline
Senior Tech

 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Southeast PA
Posts: 8,302
Default Re: less expensive option than lee 62420 for conversion

There is a GM part, I believe it was a van application. Did you read the info on David Pozzi's site? I will find it and link here...
__________________
Eric
69 'vert project big block/TKO 600 RR
68 'vert driver RS clone -- gone!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old Feb 14th, 13, 09:44 AM
Eric Kammerer Eric Kammerer is offline
Senior Tech

 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Southeast PA
Posts: 8,302
Default Re: less expensive option than lee 62420 for conversion

http://69camaro.nextmill.net/steering.html

http://www.camaros.net/forums/showth...tive+lee+joint
__________________
Eric
69 'vert project big block/TKO 600 RR
68 'vert driver RS clone -- gone!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old Feb 14th, 13, 10:34 AM
davidpozzi davidpozzi is offline
Moderator

David Pozzi
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Central California, USA
Posts: 9,401
Default Re: less expensive option than lee 62420 for conversion

Pretty much anything GM from 1979 up will work. I think even pickup rag joints work 79-87 & perhaps even newer. GM went to Saginaw fittings and the small PS shaft size on everything, cars & pickups around 1978 or 79. I have seen them in the store in the "help" brand which is Dorman or Motormite. There is a similar but larger OD version rag joint that works but is bulky and may rub the frame in some applications.
__________________
Check my web page for First Gen Camaro suspension info: http://www.pozziracing.com
67 RS 327 original owner. 1965 Lola T-70
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old Feb 14th, 13, 11:24 PM
Steiner Steiner is offline
Senior Tech

Steiner
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Lyman, SC
Posts: 7,757
Default Re: less expensive option than lee 62420 for conversion

I think Lee sells the GM part which is why it's expensive. Either one of the others will work. I have the Dorman one as I was not aware of the Lares at the time.
__________________
'69 Camaro X11 Street Car
Dart 400 - AFR-195's - 224/224 HR - Powerjection III
TKO-600 - Moser 3.42 - Detroit Truetrac
538 lb-ft - 500 hp
www.cmengines.com
'69 Camaro X44 Beater - SFT 327 - M20 - Moser 4.10
'02 Z/28 vert - stock
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old Feb 15th, 13, 04:06 AM
gphusker gphusker is offline
Senior Tech

Greg
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: nebraska
Posts: 489
Default Re: less expensive option than lee 62420 for conversion

I used one from a 79 Chevy Truck and it worked perfectly. I think it was between $20-$30.
__________________
My 69 Build thread : http://www.camaros.net/forums/showthread.php?t=211427

1995 Z28 (sold)
1987 Iroc-Z (sold)
2005 350Z (sold)
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old Feb 15th, 13, 05:40 AM
JIML82 JIML82 is offline
Senior Tech

 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Saginaw, Michigan
Posts: 1,115
Default Re: less expensive option than lee 62420 for conversion

These production flex coupling assemblies will adapt a power gear with a 3/4 diameter input shaft to your older Camaro.
1977-82 C/K (2 and 4WD) Pickups
1977-78 Camaro, Firebird, & Nova
1979 Nova
1983 - 86 C (2 WD) Pickups

Jim
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old Feb 15th, 13, 09:03 AM
TB69 TB69 is offline
Senior Tech

Ted
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Cedarburg, WI
Posts: 149
Default Re: less expensive option than lee 62420 for conversion

On my 69 I used the lares# 200 on a used 3rd gen box. It worked perfectly. Came with all of the needed bolts. It was like $25 on Amazon.

Good luck!

Ted
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old Feb 15th, 13, 09:30 AM
69 383 tko 5sp's Avatar
69 383 tko 5sp 69 383 tko 5sp is offline
Team Member

topher
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: fairview oregon
Posts: 319
Default Re: less expensive option than lee 62420 for conversion

The Dorman part that I purchased had the flat spot machined in the opposite position that it should be in. Returned it and found a different one, dont know what brand it was.
__________________
69 plain jane 383,TKO 600, 10 bolt mono 3.08 w/caltracs, TT2's 17"x9.5 rear 17'x7 fr. Goodyear F1 275/40/zr17,215/45/zr17.QA1 coil over. Speed tech uca/lca. March ultra serp.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:37 PM.



Camaros.net - 2009 AutoForums.com