Motor Codes - Team Camaro Tech
Team Camaro Tech join team camaro
 
Camaro Parts at SS396.com     
GROUND UP & SS396.com         
Official Sponsor of Team Camaro
   

Auto Insurance



Registered users (free) do not see these large ads

Tag Team De-coding tags and numbers.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old Oct 2nd, 00, 11:33 AM
my67 my67 is offline

 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Pleasanton, Ca USA
Posts: 2
Post

I have been told that my engine is a 1967 302 engine. Can anyone help.
Casting number is 3892657
Stamping number is M0702FMO
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
  #2  
Old Oct 2nd, 00, 12:03 PM
DODZ10 DODZ10 is offline

 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: LOUISIANA
Posts: 21
Post

3892657 is certainly the casting number for a 67 302\290hp and i'm pretty sure MO is
the suffix for a camaro 302. The casting number can also be a 327 or 350. someone back me up here,


DODZ10
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old Oct 2nd, 00, 02:49 PM
Silver69 Silver69 is offline
Senior Tech

 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Metro Chicago
Posts: 444
Post

That is a 302 block, but the casting was also used for 327 Chevelles and Corvettes. It was also for 302, 327, and 350 Camaros.

Please check the stamping again. MO does designate Camaro, but the stamping sequence is wrong. It should be something like the following:

F0702MO
F = Assembly Plant (Flint)
0702 = Date of assembly (July 2)
MO = Application (1967-68 Camaro 302/290)

I do not know if Flint was the plant for the 302.

[This message has been edited by Silver69 (edited 10-02-2000).]
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old Oct 2nd, 00, 03:05 PM
Jeff H Jeff H is offline
Senior Tech

 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Ewing, NJ 08560
Posts: 3,054
Post

It should be V0703MO for a 67 302. Do you have a 67 Camaro it's in right now?

------------------
Jeff H - 93 Indy 500 Pace Car(supercharged), Hugger Orange 69 Z28 with JL8 brakes & crossram
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old Oct 3rd, 00, 05:58 AM
Kurt S Kurt S is offline
Senior Tech

 
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,659
Post

Is there a partial VIN stamped on the block?

------------------
Kurt S.
www.camaros.org


Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old Oct 3rd, 00, 07:27 AM
my67 my67 is offline

 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Pleasanton, Ca USA
Posts: 2
Post

To Jeff and Kurt, The engine is not in an existing 67 Camaro. I have purchased a 67 rs that I am in the process of building to the Trans Am racing configuration and am hoping to race in some of the vintage classes. The stamped number is what made me wonder. I guess that is is possible that it has been restamped by someone along the way. In any cas I am going to build it up as a 302 for racing purposes. I am making most of the mods per instructions from Dick Guldstrand. Is this site interested in following a project such as this?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old Oct 3rd, 00, 12:17 PM
Kurt S Kurt S is offline
Senior Tech

 
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,659
Post

I think you are missing the point of our questions. An original Z block has value.

Could you recheck the engine code and see if there is a VIN on the block? Let us know what you find.

------------------
Kurt S.
www.camaros.org


Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old Oct 4th, 00, 07:19 PM
sixtsevnssrs sixtsevnssrs is offline
Senior Tech

Tim
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Spokane, WA.
Posts: 770
Post

A true 67 block would not have a vin number stamped on the block, hence if it had one in either location it would definatly not be a 67 block. In addition if the stamped code on the front of the block was FMO as stated it would not be from the 60s anyway.

------------------
Tim
67 ss/rs, MODIFIED
Tim's Homepage
AOL-IM = sixtsevnss

[This message has been edited by sixtsevnssrs (edited 10-04-2000).]
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old Oct 5th, 00, 08:53 AM
Kurt S Kurt S is offline
Senior Tech

 
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,659
Post

Umm, most 67's I've seen have the VIN stamped on them. It's the exception not to have it. I believe it was a federal requirement before 67.

The block is correct for 67 and there is no FMO code, hence asking for the recheck.

------------------
Kurt S.
www.camaros.org


Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:20 AM.



Camaros.net - © 2009 AutoForums.com