![]() |
|
Camaro Parts at SS396.com GROUND UP & SS396.com Official Sponsor of Team Camaro |
|
|
||
| Team Camaro Tech Current Topic: LOL!!!!!!!!! | ||
| Register | FAQ | Calendar | Chat | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Sponsors | Auto Escrow | Auto Loans | Insurance |
Registered users (free) do not see these large ads 
| Bench Racing Stories, cruising and more. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eB...483899885&rd=1
It is the EARLIEST production camaro i have ever seen. OF THE SEVERAL MILLION CAMAROS BUILT,
__________________
1967 RS 327 |
| Sponsored Links | ||
Advertisement | ||
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
In '69 they made around 240,000 camaros. After 35 years if the avg was 100,000 per year that would come to 3.5 million camaros. [img]graemlins/beers.gif[/img] Hard to imagine that many, isn't it?
__________________
...Dennis White Wonder The Nova Photo Album www.camaroslimited.com "Don't take life so serious, you won't get out alive..." |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Geez.....if he only knew what the Fisher Body number really meant......
If it were that easy.....I have him beat. I have number 19. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Tom - the ad lists the VIN, not the cowl tag. They show "7N10083" which should probably be "N100083", right?
__________________
...Dennis White Wonder The Nova Photo Album www.camaroslimited.com "Don't take life so serious, you won't get out alive..." |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
"This car is vin#83(it was built the VERY FIRST DAY OF CAMARO PRODUCTION Sept 26, 1966 at the Norwood, Ohio Plant)."
Van Nuys started regular production in early August (7th ?) 1966. Did Norwood follow ??? Cars were at our local Dealer 'Chapman Chevrolet' in Calif. on Sept. 21st 1966 - we went over for the, invitation only, open house they hosted that evening when my father got home from work (that part of the memory works well still...) Dad bought a new car from them every year or two for 30+ years. We always got invited to the new model previews - it was a big thing 'back-in-the-day'. Car seems to have some undisclosed 'integrity issues' - after viewing the areas around the rear wheel houses and tail pan, and who knows what danger lurks under the carpeting and in the trunk... Guess you'd be foolish to expect anything less from an 'right coast' vehicle. Boy - if I could only find #82 - just think what it is worth
__________________
1968 Convertible Some trucks ![]() Other V8 things - some of which float Other V6 things - none of which float ![]() Oh yeah, and 1 "Straight-Six" ... ![]() If a man says something in the garage - and his wife can't hear him - is he still wrong !!!
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Chalk it up to everyone being an expert and all camaros are rare. If it's #100083 on the vin it's #83 right? The auction started at $100 with no reserve, buyers/bidders are setting the price on this one not the seller.
__________________
...Dennis White Wonder The Nova Photo Album www.camaroslimited.com "Don't take life so serious, you won't get out alive..." |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
The delevery date on my protect-o plate states 12-16-1966 to Chase Chevrolet, in Stockton California.
It was built late November and was the 19th, L30/M20 off of the Los Angles assembly line.
|
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
my Dad bought one in Sept of 66. It was even titled as a 66.
If I knew then what I know now, I guess I wouldn't have beat it like a dog when I was in my mid teens. Yeah right!
__________________
69 cranberry red convertible LT1 4L60E NY "BADASELL" |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Believe it or not CRG has data on two cars with earlier vin#s. I have asked for the cowl tag data for this car, but no response. |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
There is something wrong with those numbers. A 2 digit VIN would have had a build date of 08C or 08D not a build date in September. My car has a VIN of L1003xx and is an 08E build date.
|
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________________________________________ I totaly agree Dan. Norwood was first. I knew that Norwood had the first Tooling sets and ran the first test production. But, in his add statment he said Norwood built "His #83 car" in late Sept. 1966 ??? I knew this couldn't be right and really was just poking fun at his claims. Many moons ago (@ 1972~73) I ran across a file at the Van Nuys plant that showed an 'F-body Final Assembly' product start date as Aug 7th, 1966. Maybe or it was misstated and should have read 17th ??? But the date was the 7th on the forms. It was pertaining to 'Labor Hours' and in a Labor accounting file so maybe this was some tooling test assembly/training time or ??? It wasn't my group or dept. so I didn't really think anything of it at the time, other that it was an interesting piece of data. Knowing all those files were transfered to Mich. or distroyed really bugs me now, there could have been some interesting data to be mined in them.
__________________
1968 Convertible Some trucks ![]() Other V8 things - some of which float Other V6 things - none of which float ![]() Oh yeah, and 1 "Straight-Six" ... ![]() If a man says something in the garage - and his wife can't hear him - is he still wrong !!!
|
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
I've seen 7L100016, and 7N100013. Those are VIN's not body numbers.
Who can guess the build week stamped on the Cowl tag of 7N100013 (except Daniel cause he knows)? Hint; it's not in August. I guess I should add that this car was a pilot car, not a production car. |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
I'll guess July!!
Oh, you wanted week....How about second week of July!!
__________________
Best of 1.55 - 11.57@114.33 |
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
Not even close.
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|