Team Camaro Tech join team camaro
 
Camaro Parts at SS396.com     
GROUND UP & SS396.com         
Official Sponsor of Team Camaro
   

Registered users (free) do not see these large ads

Tech 2002 General Tech questions from 2002
Replies ONLY, no new topics.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old Feb 5th, 02, 06:20 AM
camaroman7d camaroman7d is offline
Senior Tech

Royce
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Vacaville, CA
Posts: 8,210
Post

I saw a post here not too long ago agout a guy having trouble getting the clutch rod to fit in his 69. I am switching from auto to manual in my 69. I know a kid that is doing just the opposite in his 68. He wants to trade pedal assemblies, but from what I read I think they are different. Is this correct? or is the rod the only thing that is different? Please clear this up for me.

Royce

------------------
70 Camaro 385ci
69 Camaro (soon to be 6" rod 355 backed by a T56)
2000 GMC Z71

http://hobbystage.net/camaro/camaroman7d/
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old Feb 5th, 02, 07:03 AM
bretcopsey bretcopsey is offline
Senior Tech

 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: ohio
Posts: 1,333
Post

I THINK the difference is the 69 pedal has a second hole for the rod attachment. For some pictures see
http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homep...ch_linkage.htm

This may also be of some help.....
http://www.camaros.net/forum/Forum7/HTML/001816.html

------------------
Bret Copsey
'68 Camaro base coupe
'92 Caprice wagon
'98 Malibu
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old Feb 5th, 02, 07:30 AM
camaroman7d camaroman7d is offline
Senior Tech

Royce
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Vacaville, CA
Posts: 8,210
Post

I will be running a t56 setup if that makes any difference. I guess I should go ahead and trade, since I will have no use for the autmatic/brake pedal.

Royce
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old Feb 5th, 02, 08:07 AM
bretcopsey bretcopsey is offline
Senior Tech

 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: ohio
Posts: 1,333
Post

I think you're probably right. The T56 setup probably requires some pedal modifications anyway. You may want to check this link for some good advice
http://www.pro-touring.com/t56/index.htm

------------------
Bret Copsey
'68 Camaro base coupe
'92 Caprice wagon
'98 Malibu

[This message has been edited by bretcopsey (edited 02-05-2002).]
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old Feb 6th, 02, 02:18 PM
JohnZ JohnZ is offline
Team Member

John
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Washington, Michigan USA
Posts: 7,137
Post

The second hole (upper - smaller) in the '69 clutch pedal is for a plastic bushing for the link rod to the clutch safety switch. The other (larger - lower) hole is for the clutch pushrod.

------------------
JohnZ
CRG
'69 Z28 Fathom Green
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old Feb 7th, 02, 06:03 AM
camaroman7d camaroman7d is offline
Senior Tech

Royce
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Vacaville, CA
Posts: 8,210
Post

John, will the 67/68 pedal assembly work for my 69? I will be making the trade this evening.

Royce
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old Feb 7th, 02, 01:36 PM
JohnZ JohnZ is offline
Team Member

John
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Washington, Michigan USA
Posts: 7,137
Post

Don't know for sure - the pushrod hole is 3/8" lower on the pedal on the '67-'68 pedal, which is probably why the '69 pushrod has a bend in it and the '67-'68 rod does not.

------------------
JohnZ
CRG
'69 Z28 Fathom Green
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old Feb 10th, 02, 11:58 AM
68 RS 68 RS is offline

 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Orange Co. N.Y.
Posts: 16
Post

My Classic Industries catalogue says that the clutch pedal will fit but the brake pedal is different. Since you are using the T-56 I'd start with that and maybe you can make it work. If not then the ones that do fit are only like $80.

...Ron
Reply With Quote
 
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:18 PM.


Camaros.net - © 2009 AutoForums.com