![]() |
|
Camaro Parts at SS396.com GROUND UP & SS396.com Official Sponsor of Team Camaro |
|
||
| Team Camaro Tech Current Topic: CAM | ||
Registered users (free) do not see these large ads 
| Tech 2003 General Tech Area from 2003 Replies ONLY, no new topics. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
IF MY 80 Z-28 ONLY HAS 18000 ORIGINAL MILES, IS IT STILL NECESSARY TO INSTALL NEW VALVE SPRINGS OR PUSH RODS WHEN INSTALLING A MILD COMP HIGH ENERGY CAM?
THANKS. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
With no more miles than that I would say you would not need to. Unless cam lift is more than .460 Much more is too much for stock springs.
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Ditto. If you felt like it, you could get a new set of decent pushrods fairly cheap.
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
the car might only have 18,000 miles on it, but the car is also 23 years old. it couldn't hurt to pop in new valve springs.
------------------ 1971 Nova(looks like 69 camaro from underneath!) 355sb, vortec heads, HOT cam,T-10 tranny, 3.70 gears 16X8" IROC wheels. 12" Corvette brakes on the way. see dirty pics here of a car that gets driven http://community.webshots.com/user/novaderrik |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
I would personally used a new set of springs.
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
I always use the springs installed at the height that the cam manufacturer recommends. It will ensure the cam works the way it's supposed to.
------------------ '69 RS Camaro 355 5-speed 4.11 |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Use what the cam manufacturer recommends - they know what it needs.
------------------ JohnZ CRG '69 Z28 Fathom Green |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
I'd say while you're doing it might as well. New springs aren't very much, and it may save you headaches later.
------------------ '01 Formula...a few mods 321 RWHP/338 Tq with just a lid Kansas F-body Association '72 GMC pickup...what is stock is a shorter list than isn't. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|