Exact reason the 1969 Camaro ran late - Team Camaro Tech
Team Camaro Tech join team camaro
 
Camaro Parts at SS396.com     
GROUND UP & SS396.com         
Official Sponsor of Team Camaro
   

Auto Insurance



Registered users (free) do not see these large ads

Bench Racing Stories, cruising and more.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old Dec 6th, 00, 03:36 AM
JOE58 JOE58 is online now
Gold Lifetime Member

 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: RI
Posts: 2,715
Post

Does anyone know the exact reason that Chevy gives for why the 1969 Camaro production ran late. I have read that there was a strike but since there was more then one assembly plant, was there a strike in both plants? Or was there a strike before the retooling to convert the lines for 1970 Camaro production?
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
  #2  
Old Dec 6th, 00, 04:51 AM
X77D80 X77D80 is offline
Senior Tech

 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Galt,CA,USA
Posts: 457
Post

Good question! I'd like to know as well. I have one of the latest 69 Camaros out there. It's an 11A car and the vin is 123479N711330.
Anyone have one later??
See link below for pics.

------------------
69 Z/28
www.camarogenerations.com
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old Dec 6th, 00, 05:53 AM
gheatly gheatly is offline
Senior Tech

Gene
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 2,744
Post

The reason I have heard for production running late was because GM was having preproduction problems with the new 1970 body style. Rather than stop production of the already successful 1969 model, GM continued to produce it until the kinks were worked out of the new model.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old Dec 6th, 00, 07:53 AM
68SS396 68SS396 is offline
Senior Tech

 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: MA, USA
Posts: 760
Post

X77D80, I checked out your pictures, nice car. Yours is now the latest one I know about. Previously the latest one I knew was a six cyl 711297
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old Dec 6th, 00, 09:25 AM
Joe B Joe B is offline
Senior Tech

 
Join Date: Oct 1998
Location: Brampton, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 145
Question

As a side note Chevrolet's back up plan (in case the new Camaro couldn't be ready) was to turn the '69 Camaro models into 1970 (minor, if any changes) models. They even had photo's (1969 Camaros with 1970 Licence plates ready for brochures etc). There was all kinds of law suits over the dealers selling '69 models as '70's. It was deemed necessary at that time to change the styling every two/three years. Ironically the second generation lasted 12 years.

Here's a headline from one of the double page '70 magazine ads that ran:

"New Camaro. Now our competitors know how the captain of the Titanic felt."

This advertisement had artwork as opposed to photography very common back then in advertising.

the closing tag read:

See it, Feb. 26th At your Chevrolet Sports Dept.



[This message has been edited by Joe B (edited 12-07-2000).]
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old Dec 6th, 00, 03:10 PM
Mark C Mark C is offline
Senior Tech

Mark
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Shrewsbury, MA, USA
Posts: 6,535
Post

N711922 is the last VIN of record, so yours must be about the last day of production.


------------------
Mark Canning
1969 Indy Pace Car
350/300HP RPO Z11
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old Dec 6th, 00, 05:56 PM
76Maro 76Maro is offline
Senior Tech

 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Lakeside, Ca
Posts: 127
Post

We just had this same argument over at the 2nd Generation Camaro board, with no resolution. I have heard both stories, but one of my car mags recently stated that it was a strike which postponed the introduction of the 1970 Camaro.

------------------
1976 Type LT Restification (in progress)

1968 2 door sport coupe...wife's car!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old Dec 6th, 00, 08:39 PM
John68rs John68rs is offline
Senior Tech

John
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Burnsville, Minnesota
Posts: 716
Post

CHP says it was a strike in this months issue. But that's just what they say ~ John

------------------
1968 RS, 355/4spd/12 blt w/3.55's.www.camarogenerations.com
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old Dec 7th, 00, 08:45 AM
pete b pete b is offline
Senior Tech

 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Boynton Beach, Florida
Posts: 780
Post

JohnZ, where are you...
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old Dec 7th, 00, 10:56 AM
tom3 tom3 is offline
Senior Tech

 
Join Date: Nov 1998
Location: ohio
Posts: 600
Post

I remember reading somewhere a long time ago that the 70 was really intended to be a 71, the 69 to run through 70. The impending emissions and the Mustang intro got GM into high gear and the car came out early, not late as we believe. Probably, we'll never know.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old Dec 7th, 00, 01:27 PM
JohnZ JohnZ is offline
Team Member

John
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Washington, Michigan USA
Posts: 8,257
Post

As I recall, there were several critical failures during tryout of nearly-completed major body panel dies at Fisher Body; modifications didn't fix the problems, and the first-stage draw dies for the quarter panels had to be redesigned and started all over again. Major draw dies of this nature take over a year to make under normal circumstances, and the die shops had to work 24 hours a day, 7 days a week to cast, machine, finish, and run press tryout on the redesigned dies in only 8 months. Chevrolet also had major problems with the front of the fender dies that probably would have delayed the program anyway, but the Fisher delay kept that issue from surfacing. This was back in the days well before the computerized draw die simulation technology we enjoy today, when dies were designed manually from wooden surface models that represented the inside of the metal surface. Computers spot these metal-forming issues today before any die work is started. Back in 1969, the first Texas Instruments calculator was considered to be an electronic miracle, and all the best mainframe computers could do was print invoices and paychecks. We've come a long way...in those days, the level of individual personal computer power each of us enjoy tonight on this forum occupied a three-story building and took about 20 full-time people to maintain. Ah, progress....

------------------
JohnZ
'69 Z28 Fathom Green
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old Dec 7th, 00, 01:52 PM
pete b pete b is offline
Senior Tech

 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Boynton Beach, Florida
Posts: 780
Smile

Thanks John!
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old Dec 8th, 00, 02:08 AM
pipeman pipeman is offline
Senior Tech

 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Pass Christian, MS
Posts: 427
Lightbulb

Did I hear John Z correct, We can make our own body panels with our home computer,WOO HOO, any body need any q-panels?

------------------
69 rallye green X77 Z/28,1967 SS 396 Conv. 1974 c-10 454 swb
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old Dec 8th, 00, 04:18 AM
67rs327 67rs327 is offline
Senior Tech

 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: grundy virginia
Posts: 209
Thumbs up

I really dont care why the kept making 69's well in to 70 I am just glad they did !!! just think if they had stopped the 69 production when they were supposed to the number of 69 camaro's would have been way less than it is and the number of the first generic camaros would be way more !!!!
SCARY ISN'T IT ,,,,,,,

------------------
67 RS 327 deluxe tach gauges , camaro's rule !

[This message has been edited by 67rs327 (edited 12-08-2000).]
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old Dec 8th, 00, 05:37 AM
1st & 2nd GENGuy 1st & 2nd GENGuy is offline
Senior Tech

 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: West Richland, Wa. USA
Posts: 354
Post

From the book The Great Camaro by Michael Lamm "But complications of various sorts crept into the program, and introduction of the new body style had to be postponed until Feb. 1970-thus the 19701/2 model designation."
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:48 AM.



Camaros.net - © 2009 AutoForums.com