![]() |
|
|
|
||
| Team Camaro Tech Current Topic: Will GM learn from Ford mistakes? | ||
Registered users (free) do not see these large ads 
| Fifth Generation Discussion forum for the newest Camaro |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
According to Motor Trend, the new Shelby GT500 has a curb weight of 3944 lbs!!!! That's crazy I don't car how much power it has. GM- please - if you build a new Camaro keep the curb weight well below 3500 lbs.
__________________
68 Z/28, 406 small block, 10.75 CR, AFR 210, Vic Jr, solid roller An original Z/28 with the 302 set aside for now |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
How much did an LS-6 Chevelle weigh? Isn't it less than that?
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hopefully.
Speaking of the GT500 - checkout this review of the GT500 and the C6 Corvette ![]() http://5thgencamaro.blogspot.com/200...chevrolet.html
__________________
Joe Over Anxious 67 Camaro RS/SS L78 / 5th Gen Blog / Modern Camaro (5thgen.org) Forums Michigan Classics - Classic and Muscle Car Enthusiast Resources Hot Rod Search - Google for Gearheads |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
The problem is that this is a "global" platform from which the Camaro and a few other variants will be built. It needs to meet all kinds of crashworthyness regulations from around the world and it takes a bunch of extra metal in odd places to do that. There may be plenty of opportunities for a racer to lighten the car - but the stock folks will be a bit on the heavy side..... There is a saying that "mass begets mass" which means the heavier something is, the heavier you need to build a structure to hold it - it feeds on itself !!
__________________
Tom - Oxford, MI GM Powertrain '68 Camaro Coupe 396/375HP SS (Cloned Car - Real 375 HP Engine )
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
I agree with TJ.
In today's world a car must meet all kinds of safety and crash requirements. Plus you now have power everything, deluxe A/C, stereo surround sound etc. etc. etc. This is why the new Mustang weighs so much. This is also why the regular 2006 Corvette inspite of giving up about 100 horse power to the Mustang beat the 'Stang by 1/10th in the 1320 because of the 600 or so pound weight advantage. Remember the Mustang LX 5.0's of the very late 1980's. Especially the trunk type/notchbacks. These cars were around 2900 lbs or so and had about a 400-500 lb weight advantage over the 5.7L IROC-Z's. Even though the IROC had about 20 more horsepower that mattered little when you give up 400-500 lbs. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
On the weight and global structure issue, at least all the players have to abide by the same rules
![]() Quote:
__________________
Joe Over Anxious 67 Camaro RS/SS L78 / 5th Gen Blog / Modern Camaro (5thgen.org) Forums Michigan Classics - Classic and Muscle Car Enthusiast Resources Hot Rod Search - Google for Gearheads |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
No, they haven't learned from Ford's successes either. GM is still out there trying to re-invent the wheel.
__________________
Craig ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Now you will see that evil will triumph, because good is dumb. -Dark Helmet 1967 Camaro 1965 Mustang 2007 Mustang |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
deleted
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Ford 9" direct swap to 68 Camaro | Not2LateForThis68 | Transmission & Driveline | 13 | May 16th, 06 05:06 PM |
| Ford TKO 600 conversion issues for my '69? | 69RSCONVERTIBLE | Transmission & Driveline | 8 | Jan 23rd, 06 02:43 PM |
| Wow guys.. looks like GM is not the only guys in trouble! | garfield | Bench Racing | 13 | Jan 22nd, 06 11:05 AM |
| 9" Ford Swap Info | Dans67 | Brakes, Suspension & Steering | 12 | Dec 4th, 05 07:26 PM |
| weight of a 67' camaro? | CamaroNOTcamero | Performance | 16 | Sep 17th, 01 08:12 PM |