![]() |
|
Camaro Parts at SS396.com GROUND UP & SS396.com Official Sponsor of Team Camaro |
|
|
||
| Team Camaro Tech Current Topic: Just switched heads looking for simular switch gains | ||
Registered users (free) do not see these large ads 
| Performance Our High Performance area |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
went from small valve camel humps to WP sportsman II's what kinda gains can I expect?
|
| Sponsored Links | ||
Advertisement | ||
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
It all depends on any mods that were done to the camel humps. Before all this new technology people had to port the camel humps. Some people knew what they were doing and got some big numbers from ported camel humps. But with all the aftermarket stuff availible I don't know why anyone that's going to spend money would keep them.
__________________
Drive it like a stolen rental!!! |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
I went from stock home ported and polished 400 heads (1.94/1.6) to Protpoline 200's (2.05/1.6) and am 1 full second and 8 MPH faster in the 1/4. Not quite a good comparison but you can see the gain.
__________________
68 Camaro~ LSx RedЯum <-Pics http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Of8WV...ature=youtu.be <~More here |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
yeah I was hoping someone out there did the exact same switch, Im just hoping for 2-3 tenths.
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Mine have gasket matched intake runners, 164cc runners and 62.5 cc chambers with 1.94 / 1.5 valves. The new heads are 200cc runners 2.02/1.6 64cc chambers and im going to pocket port and gasket match only. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
I think you'll see that and then some.
__________________
68 Camaro~ LSx RedЯum <-Pics http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Of8WV...ature=youtu.be <~More here |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Thanks thats very encouraging! |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
As long as you have enough carb/intake to feed them, you should feel a considerable difference. 164 to a 200 is fairly substanial. Your other heads would've worked well on a small to medium cu in small block with a cam with duration @.050 around 224 max. 164cc would have gave up around 5000 rpm. They probably made good torque down low. The new heads would accomodate medium to larger cu in with a cam duration @.050 up to 250ish. With the right compression it would be a well rounded package.
__________________
Drive it like a stolen rental!!! |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Yeah im at 11.57:1 (11.32:1 I think with the new heads though) and 252/260 @ 50 duration. I think my whole combo was begging for more air! The old heads did fall off at 6,300 on the dyno. |
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| interpret my time slips...whats happening? | BBC1 | Performance | 60 | Jul 12th, 05 08:15 AM |
| Need info about vortec heads | big lubowski | Performance | 7 | Oct 12th, 03 04:24 PM |
| Aluminum heads vs. Cast Iron Heads | peter19u | Performance | 67 | Jul 15th, 03 02:16 PM |
| SR TORKER HEADS AND STOCK HEADS | KEVY G | Tech 2000 | 8 | Apr 6th, 01 05:34 PM |
| truck heads vs. hump heads | toolman | Tech 2000 | 3 | Nov 1st, 00 08:34 PM |