245 with a 335? - Team Camaro Tech
Wheels & Tires What fits what?

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of 13 (permalink) Old Dec 6th, 04, 08:50 PM Thread Starter
Tech Team
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Bay Area, California
Posts: 59
Post

are any of you running a 245 in the front with a 315 or 335 in back with a 17in or 18in wheel. I'm going to minitub and was wondering if you guys think a 245, 335 combo would look funny. The stielow chevelle looks pretty good with the 245, 315 combo to me. Do you guys think its too much of a jump with the 335's?

any pictures would be appreciated
thanks for any replies
got muncie? is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 13 (permalink) Old Dec 7th, 04, 05:08 AM
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Marietta, GA
Posts: 20
Send a message via AIM to camaroskip
Post

In my opinion a 245 would be sufficient to a 315 rear. If this were a perfect world, a 275 could fit and be a great match. I'm now running 245 all around on 16's but I plan to upgrade to a staggered 17/275 up front and an 18/315 out back. I think the only problem you would encounter regarding the aesthetics of the tires would be if you were to put a 215 or a 225 with those monster 315's in the rear. I hope that this clears up a little with your concerns. -Chris

`Skip
camaroskip is offline  
post #3 of 13 (permalink) Old Dec 7th, 04, 05:40 PM
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 10
Post

I think a 245 to 315 is way too much of a jump. 275 to 315 is less than ideal as it is. You should try to run all 4 the same size, check out some autox or road course cars. The really competetive cars (the ones that win a lot) usually run all 4 tires the same size. It makes the car more predictable and easier to set up for neutral handling.

I run 275/315 17's only because I can't fit 315 on the front.
dennis68 is offline  
 
post #4 of 13 (permalink) Old Dec 7th, 04, 11:02 PM Thread Starter
Tech Team
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Bay Area, California
Posts: 59
Post

i'm not going to be hard core road racing, if anything i'll be at the strip more, i'm just worried about the look
got muncie? is offline  
post #5 of 13 (permalink) Old Dec 7th, 04, 11:02 PM Thread Starter
Tech Team
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Bay Area, California
Posts: 59
Post

thanks for the replies
got muncie? is offline  
post #6 of 13 (permalink) Old Dec 8th, 04, 07:14 AM
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 828
Post

I have 245 and 335's on the 69 now, but it looks like I'll be bumping the fronts to 275, maybe even 285.
69ProTouring is offline  
post #7 of 13 (permalink) Old Dec 8th, 04, 01:06 PM
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 309
Post

What year is your Camaro? In a 67 or 68 a 335 is tough. The wider rear of a 69 releives that some. If you do not want to change rear rims for drag than a 17 would be better with the larger sidewall.

Ok Scott how are you getting 285s up there?
Brian
baz67 is offline  
post #8 of 13 (permalink) Old Dec 8th, 04, 03:01 PM
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 828
Post

I'm really leaning towards an aftermarket subframe. It will shake up the budget (again!) and slow down the progress even more, but I think it will be worth it.
69ProTouring is offline  
post #9 of 13 (permalink) Old Dec 8th, 04, 05:56 PM Thread Starter
Tech Team
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Bay Area, California
Posts: 59
Post

i have a 68, I'm not going to the drags all the time so its not a big deal, i'd rather look better. The sidewall would only be a little more then a half inch shorter then the 17, do you think that will be significant. also, how hard would it be to do a 335 verses a 315, more then notching the frame? thanks for all the feedback
got muncie? is offline  
post #10 of 13 (permalink) Old Dec 8th, 04, 05:58 PM Thread Starter
Tech Team
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Bay Area, California
Posts: 59
Post

nice ride 69protouring, just the pictures i was looking for, perfect stance
got muncie? is offline  
post #11 of 13 (permalink) Old Dec 9th, 04, 07:14 AM
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 828
Post

Thanks!
69ProTouring is offline  
post #12 of 13 (permalink) Old Dec 9th, 04, 03:25 PM
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 309
Post

The notching for the minitub is the same for both tires. It gets real narrow at the rear of the frame rail, .5" or so. On a 67 or 68 the outer wheelhose is not as large(wide) as a 69 and that is where you loose the space. You could roll the lip to create more room for the 335s.
Brian
baz67 is offline  
post #13 of 13 (permalink) Old Dec 29th, 04, 06:43 PM
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 44
Post

I have the 245/315 combo on my 68 you can see pics at my web page. Also you can see some mini-tub, ect. pics.

I did a 2.5" mini-tub not the standard 3" and I have plenty of room for the 315s...what this means is that I only had to section the frame half the width of the rail and not most of the way...good idea if you plan on using leaf springs...and as Brian stated, getting 335s under a 67-68 is a MUCH tighter fit that on a 69.

Hope this helps!! [img]smile.gif[/img]
awr68 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Team Camaro Tech forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address.
NOTE we receive a lot of registrations with bad email addresses. IF you do not receive your confirmation email you will not be able to post. contact support and we will try and help.
Be sure you enter a valid email address and check your spam folder as well.



Email Address:
OR

Log-in










Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome