Seems to be some mixed messages in this.....
I have been reading around.....various forums. Some people are saying Dynacorn is wider than DSE, others think otherwise.
So we have:
So I have been doing a little research.....
I also notice on Camaro central - they advertise the following:
***Note they mention frame rails also need to be modded on this 2" tub option.
Although the specs and dimensions closely resemble this:
Images looked like they were pulled from the Dynacorn site, so if that is right - camaro central are saying frame rails need to be altered for the Dynacorn unit.
We know the DSE tubs definitely require notching
**Seems to indicate that it is 2 1/4" wider tub.
So if the description is accurate - you would think the goodmark unit is WIDER than the Dynacorn unit??
So out of the 3, would seem the Dynacorn unit is the smallest offering, but if you believe what some websites state, that also need notching of the frame rails.
Other comments here infer the 2" can be muscled and finessed to work without modifying the rails??
Is that the consensus?
Others mention cutting and moving the existing tub back to the chassis and creating a filler panel to close the gap.
That could work, but would be less fabrication in buying a wider tub that simply fits.....be good to get the 100% confirmed.
Can anyone add any final comments on this subject to close it out?
To be honest - I am still a little confused as to the best option to widen WITHOUT touching rails.
....And to comment on the other post about doing it anyway...our engineers in australia KNOW when you do stuff. These engineers have seen guys trying to dodge the rules to get cars on roads for years....they are all over it. Do it right and do it legal.....with their approval. Otherwise all sorts of headaches will follow. So need to do this without notching the rails....