I'm glad Djd called the owner...I too was going to e-mail (tried through the E-Bay page, but failed) the seller to let him know that he does not have an SS and if he's presenting it as such, he needs to be careful. As I posted, he could liable if he knowingly or unknowingly sold a vehicle as something it's not. I also had questions about the mileage, because the ad's text offered two versions. Lastly, since the seller seemed to have the book regarding the paint, interior and vinyl top codes, I wanted to ask why the seller didn't turn a few more pages to learn about the rest of the car, instead of posting "we don't know what we have" (he has a base Camaro). I have a dog in this fight, because as a buyer and seller of Camaro's (almost all 69's) I'm impacted by the integrity of others in the business. So if there are few who wish to be a "car nazi", perhaps it would expose a few of the crooks in our hobby. Again, I'm not saying the owner of orange/orange is a crook, but the ad makes me uncomfortable.
My man DjD and I had a gentleman's disagreement about the verbage in the ad.
He thought the tactics were ok; my opinion was that it crossed the line. It was a simple discussion of differing views. No big deal.
But now we have all this...I'm not at all sure what brought it on or why the verbal attacks,...but remember, when you throw mud, you lose ground.
Finally, to those involved, I apologize for my "udder ignorance".