Team Camaro Tech banner
1 - 20 of 29 Posts

· Premium Member
67 SS/RS
Joined
·
433 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
I did a search and there are posts with this info, but it is buried in some threads and I thought this may be easier to find if someone was looking for the info.
When upgrading power a lot of people will beef up the drive shaft to match. Most common upgrade is to go from 1310 stock sized u joints to 1350 u joints.
Here is what the difference looks like:

stock driveshaft vs 3.5" aluminum - huge weight difference.
Wood Gas Rectangle Musical instrument Metal


up close of each end:
Rim Wood Automotive tire Auto part Automotive wheel system

Office supplies Wood Fashion accessory Cylinder Metal
 

· Premium Member
67 SS/RS
Joined
·
433 Posts
Discussion Starter · #3 ·
@SoCal805 I was going to throw this in here too, I found your pictures and was going to credit you for them. But when I tried to save them off the internet, it was saving in an odd format so I just skipped it. Good add here.
 

· Moderator
Joined
·
17,145 Posts
Do tell....

Perhaps the biggest drawback again aluminum is its susceptibility to breakage. In these situations, not only will the driveshaft fail, but shrapnel-like pieces can damage adjacent systems and possibly injure vehicle occupants and those nearby. In addition, noise and vibration will be more noticeable with aluminum.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
4,617 Posts
My $.02 is if its a track, 1/4 mi, car making over 500hp than a steel DS or exploding wallet fiber for higher HP. For me having drag raced all my life but with cars making mid 400 hp running a tire I have never had an issue with Aluminum. Even in a 4200lb+ car running a tire with 3k rpm clutch dumps.

Heck just look at all the cars with stock 1310 u joint shafts that are still on these 50+ year old cars then have 300-400hp

I did the Super Chevy tour for years. The one aluminum DS fail I saw at The Strip in Vegas, Inland Empire shaft, was the front weld failed so yoke just spun in shaft. made some noise on the line but otherwise no breakage.

Regardless of DS material one has...a DS safety loop should absolutely part of the mix. NHRA requires one if running a tire but that "why" translates into street use also...unless you are into pole vaulting.

and yeah go with at least 1330 but better yet 1350 yokes/U-joints
 

· Premium Member
67 SS/RS
Joined
·
433 Posts
Discussion Starter · #11 ·
My driveshaft is a PST.

@Vega$69 I did read that before purchasing and was concerned so I called PST, they recommended the 3.5" aluminum for my application. With so many options available today - everything has its "pros and cons". I did not want my driveshaft to be a weak link, they told me the one I got was rated to 1200 horsepower... and nitrous, I don't think I will ever have over 500 in my ride so I thought that was a decent safety factor.
 

· Premium Member
68 Base Camaro, 355 Offy crossram, Richmond Street close ratio 5 spd, 92K SoCal car
Joined
·
3,370 Posts
I will go AL 1350 eventually. Safety loop until then. Been in a car when rear 1310 u-joint failed, that was fun. Uncle lost his GTX to a front u-joint/driveshaft, he survived, car did not. Pole vaulting does happen. He talked to me more than once about a safety loop when I got into cars. My steel 1310 is on borrowed time at 54 yrs old, and its heavy.

My reasoning. GM 96 Z 1LE had aluminum driveshaft option. I like carbon fiber, worked with it since 81 in aviation. But when used in heavy load carrying applications there is almost no damage tolerance. I would worry road rash on the street may compromise one pretty easily. Dragstrip is a great place for one though. Plus I will never make enough power to need carbon & that is a good thing for several reasons.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
966 Posts
Looks good and I'm sure your new driveshaft will work out well but other than weight savings of about 11 lbs. I really don't see any tangible advantage going with aluminum. A major point being steel is stronger than aluminum and it can be quite a few bucks cheaper. I guess it comes down to personal preference.
 

· Premium Member
68 SS/RS, 468 BB TKX, 3.73 Posi, Original Lemans Blue, QA1 Coil Overs/control arms.
Joined
·
1,042 Posts
Ive had safety loops in the back of my mind. Are they designed to be installed in the front of the DS or rear? I dont have much if any room in the front, I kind of thought the H pipe that is just behind the front u joint would act as an anti-pole vaulter. No?
 

· Premium Member
68 Base Camaro, 355 Offy crossram, Richmond Street close ratio 5 spd, 92K SoCal car
Joined
·
3,370 Posts
NHRA (2017) says max distance from front u-joint C/L to be 6 "
Line Cylinder Font Parallel Auto part
 

· Moderator
Joined
·
17,145 Posts
If you have an x pipe or h pipe exhaust it may be close enough to the tailshaft to support the DS if the front joint breaks
 

· Registered
Joined
·
4,617 Posts
Yeah, H or X pipe behind front yoke would be a poor man's safety loop. It would not suffice for NHRA tech inspection as a SFI rated one would be needed....but for practical purposes it would eliminate the pole vault ooopsy otherwise.
Automotive tire Vehicle Gas Rim Motor vehicle


Automotive tire Bumper Gas Automotive wheel system Auto part
 
1 - 20 of 29 Posts
Top