1 - 9 of 9 Posts

Everyone always advises to go from t-bolts to U-bolts (which I just did two weeks ago), its obvious U-bolts are stronger, but I got to thinking, and if the T-bolts have worked for 41 years and haven't let you down yet (assuming your not drag racing it), then maybe.... just maybe... they are OK.

But like I said, I switched mine out too.

I ripped my spring perch of an axle tube, 327, 2bl, pg, and the 1/4 panelEveryone always advises to go from t-bolts to U-bolts (which I just did two weeks ago), its obvious U-bolts are stronger, but I got to thinking, and if the T-bolts have worked for 41 years and haven't let you down yet (assuming your not drag racing it), then maybe.... just maybe... they are OK.

But like I said, I switched mine out too.

yes I drove the car like a 17/23 year old. And was bought new.

Thanks,

John

Thanks,

John

If you go with all u-bolts, you are connecting the rear to the leafs with four connections. If you use two u bolts and two t bolts, the rear is connected with only two connections.

I don't know if the t bolts are twice the diameter.....the holes in the shock plates would have to be 3/4" for them to fit through. My t bolts were exactly the same size as the u bolts.

But I'll take the simple approach, if the T-bolts and U-bolts are the same diameter, and the same hardness, then the shear strength of them will both be the same.

It would however, seem that the U-bolts would have an advantage for more tensional strength since the U-bolt would have more contact area across the top of the axle, along with the forces of both ends being pulled from under the perch.

With that being the case, that extra tension could keep the axle from sliding sideways on the shock plates which would then bring the shear strength of either bolt into question.

For the small amount of $$ difference, I went with new U-bolts.

Huh? Last I checked they were both 7/16-20. (as originally built by GM))I don't understand why y'all are saying the u-bolts are "obviously" stronger. The T bolts are twice as thick in diameter as the u-bolts.

Thanks,

John

Seems pretty simple to me. The T-bolt itself will likely never fail, but they place all of the stress on the welds that hold the spring perch to the axle tube. The U-bolt seems like it would share that stress with the welds. Since GM decided the "performance" models needed one u-bolt per side, it only seems logical that all four u-bolts would be even stronger.

But I'll take the simple approach, if the T-bolts and U-bolts are the same diameter, and the same hardness, then the shear strength of them will both be the same.

It would however, seem that the U-bolts would have an advantage for more tensional strength since the U-bolt would have more contact area across the top of the axle, along with the forces of both ends being pulled from under the perch.

With that being the case, that extra tension could keep the axle from sliding sideways on the shock plates which would then bring the shear strength of either bolt into question.

For the small amount of $$ difference, I went with new U-bolts.

1 - 9 of 9 Posts

Join the discussion

Team Camaro Tech

A forum community dedicated to 1st generation Chevy Camaros owners and enthusiasts. Come join the discussion about performance, builds, restoration, modifications, classifieds, troubleshooting, reviews, and more!

Full Forum Listing
Explore Our Forums

Popular Communities

Join now to ask and comment!