RickB1B,
What are the specs of your camaro? trans? gears? heads? what rpm do you usually take her to? idle quality?
I keep hearing that we should build a 327 to see high rpms, but i keep running test and they always max out around 5000 or so. I need to keep this looking like a stock 327/275 with the stock exaust manifolds. I was gonna build off a 210hp engine, but i recently ran into some nice stock 275hp heads, so I'm definitly upgrading to them. I'll change the cam, but it seems pointless to go insane, like 3Dude's 294 duration Crane cam @ .525 lift, unless you open up with headers and new ignition and everything that needs to be added. I really like the look of vintage exaust manifolds with camelhumps and the intake where the oil filler tube sticks out:
See my camaro has stock A/C like this one, so I'm keeping her looking like she might have rolled off the assembly like... I love the true look.
I guess I might as well put down what I'm doing:
It'll be a weekend cruiser for driving and some car shows, 327/275hp look-a-like made from a stock 210hp(changing 210np heads and intake to 275hp versions), m-20 trans, switched from a powerglide on the column. Factory AC, powersteering, power brakes(drums in back), 10-bolt rear with 3.08 or 3.55 gears, it'll never see a race track, nice paint job like this one:
and a engine bay lookin like the one pictured above.
Any input on what gears I should run are welcome. My cam will most likely be between Crane 266, Comp 256, or one of the other 256-266 duration variations available. They are probably all the same... This is crazy, should i go single pattern/dual pattern?, 110 degree, 112, or 114? The questions never stop! At least I know what heads, intake manifold, and exaust manifolds I'm using. I guess the key is to keep eliminating parts and eventually you will have a whole engine to build.
------------------
1968 Coupe, 327/210hp project in process.
PS/PB, Factory AC
[This message has been edited by JIM68 (edited 01-31-2002).]
[This message has been edited by JIM68 (edited 01-31-2002).]
[This message has been edited by JIM68 (edited 01-31-2002).]