This is BS …. Unless you're referring to Z/28 or some other low production model, L78 maybe, 67 and 68 prices are basically the same. Yes, in general, 69's are a bit higher.…. It may be a great car, but 68's are the middle child and don't bring as much as 67 or 69. Not saying they are bad cars, just the facts. This was in no way a jab at 68's. I like all Camaro's except gen 4. Sorry gen 4 guys.
Not fact, it's opinion. And you know what they say about opinions.Garth. Its not opinion, its fact. Look at the trends. Look at the past auctions, or even eBay . 67 and 69 sell for more. It is what it is. Chevelle, Camaro, Nova, Corvette, even the pickups . The color does not help either. If you want to take it as a jab, then that's your opinion. It was not meant that way, but sometimes the truth hits you like a jab. The same car in a 67 or a 69 for some reason brings more money. I like the 68 better than the 67. Not a fan of the vent windows. However on the 68 I don't like the awkward last thought looking marker lights, or the top of the door thick chrome trim. Just my opinion. Ideally to me I wish the 69 came with the dash and gauge pod of the 67/68. I personally like the early chrome bumper second gens. I did not seek out my 69. I told a guy I would buy it if he didn't want it when he got it. He called my bluff. I sold my 67 chevy 2 and kept my word. I do not dislike my 69, but a pretty much stock first gen is not as much fun to drive as the restomods. My opinion. My 69 is mostly stock. It does have a 5 speed and a bigger holley carb.
Not fact, it's opinion. And you know what they say about opinions.
I just checked NADA average values for one of my favorite Camaro's RS Convertible for all 3 first generation years.
1967: $35,100
1968: $37,500
1969: $34,100
https://www.nadaguides.com/Cars/1967/Chevrolet/Camaro-Rally-Sport/2-Door-Convertible/Values
https://www.nadaguides.com/Cars/1968/Chevrolet/Camaro-Rally-Sport/2-Door-Convertible/Values
https://www.nadaguides.com/Cars/1969/Chevrolet/Camaro-Rally-Sport/2-Door-Convertible/Values
Their facts are exactly opposite of your opinion. How about that?
Garth. Its not opinion, its fact. Look at the trends. Look at the past auctions, or even eBay . 67 and 69 sell for more. It is what it is. Chevelle, Camaro, Nova, Corvette, even the pickups . The color does not help either. If you want to take it as a jab, then that's your opinion. It was not meant that way, but sometimes the truth hits you like a jab. The same car in a 67 or a 69 for some reason brings more money. I like the 68 better than the 67. Not a fan of the vent windows. However on the 68 I don't like the awkward last thought looking marker lights, or the top of the door thick chrome trim. Just my opinion. Ideally to me I wish the 69 came with the dash and gauge pod of the 67/68. I personally like the early chrome bumper second gens. I did not seek out my 69. I told a guy I would buy it if he didn't want it when he got it. He called my bluff. I sold my 67 chevy 2 and kept my word. I do not dislike my 69, but a pretty much stock first gen is not as much fun to drive as the restomods. My opinion. My 69 is mostly stock. It does have a 5 speed and a bigger holley carb.