Has anyone dyno'd a stock unmolested Z28 to get an actual hp? I read they were 290HP rated from GM, but in reality were into the 400HP's.. ???
As others have indicated, the reality for the stock motor was not nearly that high, and time slips from the era indicate this. However, as with other small blocks, the little motor responded well to performance enhancements. Another little issue is the camshaft. With open headers and a few other Mods, Desktop Dyno puts the max horsepower at 7500 RPM, which would require a higher shift point for best ET- wow! Modern cams can improve upon this if desired. Also, here is a link to a very cool article on the Z28 for racing:chedderboy said:Has anyone dyno'd a stock unmolested Z28 to get an actual hp? I read they were 290HP rated from GM, but in reality were into the 400HP's.. ???
. . . and the elephant motor weighs in a couple hundred pounds heavier than the little DZ motor too.Neil B said:A stock DZ/MO 302 puts 230-240 SAE Net horsepower to the rear wheels. 1/4 trap speeds of 96-98 mph seen both currently and documented in road tests back in the day confirm this.
Keep in mind that a stock 426 Hemi 'Cuda only puts approx. 300-320 to the tires.
The horsepower ratings back then were gross ratings which were much higher than the net horsepower ratings used today.
So I am still kicking around my re-build, and am looking at the CompCams Nostalgia 30-30+ solid (12-673-4), the 282S, or the 284S. All have tighter lobe centers than the Fact Z Cam, which I hope will make more torque at a lower RPM. Looks much better on DD2000, whatever that is worth. Note also the -140 Cam has a tighter LC than the Fact Z Cam. I feel one thing for sure you will need to do is get your Dist set up with the right curve, and do some porting on the cylinder heads if you run the stock ones. I also plan to use the WISECO pistons...chedderboy said:Ok, that's good to hear. I'm going to have my car done in June with Doug Thorley Headers, Flowmaster exhaust, 4053 holly card, rebuild ingition system, and possibly a new camshaft. I'm thinking I'll pay a little extra for a baseline dyno reading before any of the work just to see what the net gain will be.... I wish I knew what camshaft was in the motor!
Would adding the super-dooper Z28 off-road camstaft be too much without the cross-carb setup? Should I stick with a the 30-30 factory camshaft from CompCams?
olympic69 said:So I am still kicking around my re-build, and am looking at the CompCams Nostalgia 30-30+ solid (12-673-4), the 282S, or the 284S. All have tighter lobe centers than the Fact Z Cam, which I hope will make more torque at a lower RPM. Looks much better on DD2000, whatever that is worth. Note also the -140 Cam has a tighter LC than the Fact Z Cam. I feel one thing for sure you will need to do is get your Dist set up with the right curve, and do some porting on the cylinder heads if you run the stock ones. I also plan to use the WISECO pistons...
Rob
Thanks Neil for commenting, your previous posts on the 673 cam are what made me look at it. I love hearing 302 project reports ( and PDQ67's posts!), and look forward to giving mine in the near future.Neil B said:I chose the 12-673-4 cam for my DZ. Comp makes an Ovate spring for this cam that fits the original spring pocket. I didn't want to cut up my original heads (porting/screw in studs), so I stored them and put on a set of Edelbrock 6089 RPM heads. On the Dynojet it made 280hp at 6,000rpm and the torque peak came at 4,200rpm. The cam definitely woke up the low end and it pulls hard to 6,500rpm which is as high as I go with my original short block. The weird thing about this motor is that it 'feels' faster than my 11-sec 427 Camaro and my buddie's LS1.