Team Camaro Tech banner
1 - 8 of 8 Posts

rtchaney

· Premium Member
1968 Camaro, 383, TKO 600, Posi, bad paint and bondo!
Joined
·
347 Posts
Discussion starter · #1 ·
This all started innocently enough as I was trying to calculate how much intake head flow I needed for a 350 at 6500 rpm. So, 350/8 to get cylinder volume, (43.75 cu in); convert to cubic feet, ( .02531829 cu ft); and multiply by half of the rpm in question since the cylinder only draws in air every other stroke. That equals 82 cfm. That seemed wrong so I did it again and then realized that there was fuel in the air as well. sigh... Well, I used the Stoichiometric value for fuel and a density mark of 75 degrees f to end up with an answer, that again, was confusing. I then realized duration was in effect as well and lift. I figured out the average duration based on a comp 276 roller and then quit when I realized I could just ask you guys.


What flow head flow numbers support a 350 at 6500rpm? Is it proportional when looking at a 383 or 406? Is intake flow more important than exhaust? I know this is all going to be relative to the cam, carb, heads, exhaust and intake playing well together; I'm just confused...


- Rob
 
I may be totally missing it here, but could it work if you start by use the number arrived at by calculating induction size as a baseline, then dividing by number of cylinders ??? There are multipliers in the formula for street and strokers engines.
 
Discussion starter · #5 ·
I may be totally missing it here, but could it work if you start by use the number arrived at by calculating induction size as a baseline, then dividing by number of cylinders ??? There are multipliers in the formula for street and strokers engines.
I wanted to calculate the flow needed in lieu of the runner vol due to variances in head design. I figured if I knew what flow numbers I needed, I could then look for a head that flowed that amount. What I'm finding is that people like the AFR 180s for a very good reason. Lol
 
1 - 8 of 8 Posts