You're right, it doesn't add up. Can you post some pics of the stamps ? I suspect there's something up with the partial VIN...

 

Here is a pic of partial vin.

 

Here is stamping.

 

I dunno, I'm no expert....I don't like the partial VIN much from what I can see. When the more experienced guys show up, they'll probably need a better pic...

 

Here is casting.

 

Try this again.

 

Partial VIN is a problem.....and should be more than that. I've seen this before.....parts stamped that are destined for a vehicle 2 weeks out because it's been ordered from the dealer. Typically there is a vin already matched to the engine upon ordering.

Saw some judges and a car owner get into a heated discussion about the possibility of his cowl hood not actually being available--too early for the car........

Can you upload a picture of T0425JM?

 

Here it is.

 

I have pics of that block from a couple of years ago. 9L511594
Restamped.

 

Did they just restamp the partial VIN or the entire block? I still see the broach marks on the pad. Thoughts?

 

I will check the pad above oil filter to see if VIN is stamped there. Again, if this was a restamp, why would they pay for broach marks and to stamp it wrong? VIN is Dec 68 and Pad shows assembly April 69. I would think if someone paid $1000 for restamp they would at least have it correct for their car. Thoughts?

 

I would think if someone paid $1000 for restamp they would at least have it correct for their car. Thoughts?

Some people aren't fully "aware" of what it all takes to restamp things to make them "match" their car. And even more aren't able to distinguish a restamp from an original stamp. Pretty common for guys to grab a stamp kit off the shelf and stamp their blocks and transmissions. Experts like Kurt can spot them a mile away, but not your average Joe.

 

Can't fix stupid....